blue

The “good” Politicians do not care about the Agonies of the Peoples

All the former communist countries of Eastern Europe are begging the West to join NATO. They have experienced the Russian yoke, which was finally called Soviet, and the first thing they did when the communist dictatorships fell was to ask the West for security.

Contrary to what the “useful naive” of Russia say, the West used various tricks to prevent its expansion into the former spheres of influence of the USSR. Proof of the fact that Ukraine did not join NATO because some European countries are reacting.

Criticism of the West is not what the Russian trolls are circulating. It is just the opposite. That is, the West has over-respected “Russian sensitivities” – the exact meaning of which is not known in international relations – leaving millions of people enslaved to Putin’s dictatorial appetites. Tens of thousands of them would have survived if the Western bureaucrats of politics had not dared to take the decisive step for the freedom of all the peoples of the earth.

Characteristic was the speech of Father George W. Bush, who went to Kyiv four months before the referendum to prevent the Ukrainians from gaining independence from the then USSR. In the famous “Chicken Kiev speech” the then American president said that “I come here to tell you that we support the fight for Freedom of this Great Country …. But the Americans will not support those who demand the independence of Ukraine … . “(August 1, 1991).

“Good” politicians do not care about the anxieties of the people, not even about “spheres of influence”, as the elaborate geopolitical theories say. Primarily they care about “stability”, to have their head calm to be re-elected. It’s just that Elder George W. Bush was twice unlucky. Ukrainians voted for independence with 92.26% and he lost the elections.

About the author

The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researches are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *