The Sad Tango of Argentina: the fear of bankruptcy returned
The “informal bankruptcy” that Argentina had to resort in last week denied hopes for a better future of the Argentine people who are chronicle suffers from bankruptcy conditions. The friendly governmental agenda, to businesses and to
economic orthodoxy, of the Argentine President Mauricio Macri wrecked in the
reef of the last week’s announcement that the Argentine government is failing
once again to repay its debt.
by Thanos S. Chonthrogiannis-https://liberalglobe.com
It is prohibited
by intellectual property law or in any way illegal use of this article, with
heavy civil and criminal penalties for the offender.
For this reason, the President of Argentina was forced to request an extension
of time from his creditors and a prolongation of the loan repayment of $57
billion received by Argentina from the IMF in 2018.
President Mauricio Macri has not been completely defeated as the final
elections for the Argentine Presidency will be completed by October 27th.
But the preliminary elections held on 11th August gave the win
with 16 points difference (48%-32%) to his rival and Peronist to political
ideology, Mr. Alberto Fernandez.
From the outcome of the preliminary elections alone, the capital and foreign exchange markets equally reacted “violently” to the political advance of the Peronists in power, causing the collapse of the Argentine peso that caused an increase in inflation at 55% per annum.
But the causes that led Argentina back to its forced choice for the present
informal bankruptcy are the result of a combination of the implementation of
the wrong political and economic policies as well as the negative circumstances
existed in the international economic environment.
The main cause of Mr. Macri’s election defeat was that the economic situation of the average Argentine citizen over the past fifteen months has deteriorated.
More specifically, when in 2018, the Argentine economy entered into an uncontrolled spin, forcing it to re-request the IMF assistance-loan in exchange for the imposition of fiscal austerity measures, for the period of the last fifteen months the life and economic situation of Argentine citizens is in a worse position than it was four years ago.
The Chronicle of the “spinning” of the economy
This long-suffering financial period of the last fifteen months can be summarized in the depreciation of the Argentine currency (peso) by 45% compared to before, the prices of the products were increased more than 270%, real wages fell by 10% and inflation reached 55% while three million people were found below the poverty line.
However, before we accomplish any hasty conclusions as to what went wrong is better to look in detail at the policies that have been applied in the economic field.
The main component of the failure of the Government of Mr. Macri was that the whole of its government and not only its financial staff was never fully committed from the outset and to the end in achieving a hierarchy of economic goals within a framework of an integrated financial plan that would not allow anyone to deviate from the objectives.
1. The Government of Mr. Macri has tried to stabilize the country’s economy progressively and over a three-year horizon in order to avoid the “pain” that causes a restrictive fiscal policy that always translates into political costs.
This restrictive fiscal policy is correct but cannot be applied in the case of Argentina because its federal budget has a large deficit. A large state budget deficit which the Argentine governments, due to reduced annual state revenues, must always covered it by continuous printing of money that ejected and maintains inflation at high levels, while leaving any applicable fiscal policy “unprotected” to changes in the international economic environment. More we will mention in subsequent paragraphs.
2. Applying the government of Mr. Macri a gradual restrictive fiscal adjustment to the country’s annual federal budget and after having first paid off the hedge funds (a right political action) with $4,55 billion in nominal value bonds of the government which the hedge funds held them since the country was bankrupt, its budgetary policy was exposed in the alterations of the international economic environment.
3. The government of Mr. Macri then proceeded to remove the restrictions on capital movements. The result of this policy was in 2018 and when the US increased their interest rates causing massive capital outflows from countries such as Brazil, Argentina, China, Russia and South Africa to the USA, Argentina which has the largest part of the foreign debt in US dollars was found in very
high pressure in its demand and consumption respectively and given that more domestic funds will they were headed towards the repayment of Argentinian foreign debt.
4. Anticipating development through the growth rates of the economy the government reduced export taxes to further increase the volume of trade with abroad (a sound economic policy).
The government in its effort to limit the annual federal budget deficit abolished allowances/benefits that were given to the lower income classes and had been institutionalized by the previous government. Due to high inflation the tariffs of utility companies (electricity, gas, water etc.) reached an astronomical height.
5. In addition, no investment was made from abroad that could boost domestic growth rates.
6. The main problem in Argentina’s economy is that the primary objective, the battle against inflation, was not won because it was never actually given and given that many executives from Mr. Macri’s government were not committed to this goal.
Many members of the government because of the fiscal cost that translates into political costs did not mean a strict monetary policy and since the price of restrictive fiscal policy is the drastic limitation of money supply in the economy.
While the hard peso is not conducive to exports that the government expected to increase, then increase state revenues and creating also a higher number of jobs in the economy.
The right (in our opinion) economic policy for Argentina
When as a government you face a large amount of annual inflation caused by
the continuous printing of money to finance the huge deficit in the annual
federal budget, due to reduced annual state revenues, you do not choose the
implementation of a restrictive fiscal policy over the years, but you are
choosing a steep (violent) reduction in government spending at a height that
creates an annual surplus (a violent adjustment of governmental expenses in the
line of the government revenues in the federal budget with aim to turn from
deficit to surplus).
This means not only cuts in allowances and salaries of civil servants but
massive redundancies of public servants and closure of deficient state-owned
enterprises and organizations. Reducing the size of the armed forces and
internal security forces respectively.
These cuts in the costs of the federal government will have to be completed in the maximum within one week. So, that the new federal
budget to give the maximum possible time for the economy to grow at a high rate
(this maximum time is one year from the time the federal budget is being
The total expenditure of the new annual federal state budget should never
exceed 15% of GDP and 4% of GDP from these costs goes to the payroll of all
civil servants. The same budgetary limits on annual expenditure should apply to
the budgets of the local governments in relation to their annual revenues and
not to annual GDP in this case. At the same time the currency should be
devalued further to increase the competitiveness of the Argentinian exports.
Then there should be privatisation of state-owned enterprises, transfer of
state administration competences to local governments which should then
privatise them, generalized implementation of the outsourcing practice in the
Governments (federal and local) should keep a capital size covering
unemployment benefits for a year for all the redundant civil servants. The
dismissed civil servants will be enrolled in the unemployment office and a tax
will be levied on public servants corresponding to that imposed on the salaries
of private employees and will be directed to the fund of the unemployment
After the deficit has been zeroed in the federal state budget and there is
a margin for reducing state expenditure further to 15% of GDP annually, the
saving funds will be channeled solely through the application of equivalent fiscal
value measures in the economy to further reduce tax rates on indirect and
Then and only then can taxes on export products in which Argentina has a
comparative advantage (e.g. meat, cereals, etc.) be completely reduced to
enable these sectors to compete with the respective branches of EU and USA
economies etc. and given that the peso has been devalued first.
In such an economic context will drastically increase the pace
of foreign investment in the country by operating strict fiscal policy as a
magnet for attracting investment.
In this case, inflation has been drastically reduced (no money is being
printed) and the economy is growing at a drastic pace. But this fiscal policy
has enormous political costs and will face multifarious interests. Only the
entire political world of Argentina united should explain it to the whole
people. To never find Argentina in this predicament again.
The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researchers are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.